Home › Case briefs › Civil Procedure

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay

Supreme Court of the United States · Civil Procedure

Civil ProcedureAppealabilityFinal Judgment RuleClass Actions§ 1291§ 1292(b)final decisioninterlocutory appeal

Facts

Petitioner Coopers & Lybrand certified financial statements in a prospectus for a 1972 public offering of Punta Gorda securities. Respondents bought securities in reliance on the prospectus, Punta Gorda later restated earnings downward by over $1 million for each of two years, and respondents sold at a loss of $2,650. Respondents sued under federal securities laws on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated purchasers. The District Court first certified the class and later decertified it, prompting respondents to appeal that order as of right under § 1291.

Issue

Whether a district court order denying or decertifying class certification under Rule 23 is a "final decision" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and therefore immediately appealable as of right. More specifically, whether such an order is appealable either under the collateral-order doctrine or because it sounds the "death knell" of the litigation.

Rule

An order refusing to certify or decertifying a class is not a "final decision" under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and is not immediately appealable as of right. Such an order does not qualify under the collateral-order doctrine because it is subject to revision, is generally enmeshed with the merits, and is effectively reviewable after final judgment. The possibility that the order may, as a practical matter, induce a plaintiff to abandon the case does not make it final under § 1291.

🔒

See the holding & full analysis

Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.

The court's holding and reasoning
Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case

Free sample · practice this case

Test yourself

One of 10 multiple-choice questions for this case. Pick an answer to see why.

In federal court in Chicago, Nina Patel sued Lakeshore Home Guard, a fictional appliance-warranty company, alleging deceptive billing practices on behalf of herself and thousands of customers. The district judge denied class certification, but Nina's individual damages are only $420, and she immediately filed a notice of appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Is the court of appeals likely to have jurisdiction over Nina's appeal as of right under § 1291?

Explanation. A denial of class certification is not a final decision under § 1291 because the named plaintiff remains free to proceed on an individual claim. The majority rejected the idea that practical economic pressure on a plaintiff—the so-called death knell—turns the order into a final decision. The order may be reviewed later after final judgment, and immediate appeal as of right is unavailable.