Eastside Exhibition Corp. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department · Property

Propertyattorneys' feeslandlord-tenantprevailing partyattorneys' feeslaw of the caselandlord-tenantrent

Facts

In 2002, the tenant sued the landlord seeking injunctive relief over renovation work in the premises, removal of completed work, a full rent abatement, damages, and relief preventing lease termination based on a default notice. The landlord amended its answer to assert a counterclaim for attorneys' fees and unpaid rent. The trial court dismissed the tenant's damages and rent-abatement claims, awarded the landlord unpaid rent, found the landlord's alterations de minimis and noninterfering, and found that neither party was a prevailing party, dismissing all attorneys' fee claims. After remand and further appeals, later decisions did not disturb the original finding that neither party had prevailed.

Issue

Whether the landlord was entitled to an award of attorneys' fees after the underlying litigation and subsequent appeals, despite the trial court's earlier determination that neither side prevailed. More specifically, the question was whether later appellate rulings altered that no-prevailing-party determination.

Rule

A court may deny attorneys' fees where neither party prevailed in the action. When an appellate court has already determined or accepted that neither side was a prevailing party, that determination constitutes the law of the case and binds the trial court on remand unless later appellate decisions disturb it.

🔒

See the holding & full analysis

Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.

The court's holding and reasoning
Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case

Free sample · practice this case

Test yourself

One of 10 multiple-choice questions for this case. Pick an answer to see why.

Olivia Park leased retail space in Chicago from Lakeshore Row Properties. Olivia sued for an injunction, rent abatement, and damages over building work; Lakeshore counterclaimed for unpaid rent and contractual attorneys' fees. After trial, the court denied Olivia all requested relief, awarded Lakeshore some unpaid rent, and expressly found that neither side was the prevailing party in the action.

If Lakeshore later moves for attorneys' fees under the lease, how should the court rule?

Explanation. The majority rule is that a court may deny attorneys' fees where neither party prevailed in the action. A recovery of unpaid rent or success on some issues does not automatically make one side the prevailing party if the action as a whole does not produce a clear prevailing party. (Derived from Eastside Exhibition Corp. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp. (n.d.).)