McClung v. Silliman
Facts
The plaintiff claimed a preemptive interest in land in Ohio and sought from the register of the United States land office the acts and documents necessary to initiate that right. The register refused, believing the right was already vested in another and that he had no power over the controversy. The plaintiff then sought a writ of mandamus first in the federal circuit court and then in the Ohio state court. The state court sustained its own jurisdiction over the register but dismissed the motion on the merits.
Issue
Whether a federal circuit court could issue mandamus to a register of a United States land office when the writ was sought to obtain the documents necessary to found the plaintiff's claim, and whether a state court had authority to issue mandamus to such a federal officer.
Rule
A writ of mandamus under the judiciary provisions relied on may issue only where jurisdiction already exists and the writ is necessary in aid of that existing jurisdiction, not where the writ is sought in order to create or acquire jurisdiction. State courts have no authority to issue mandamus to control officers of the United States acting in the disposition of federal property; their conduct may be controlled only by the power that created them.
See the holding & full analysis
Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.
- The court's holding and reasoning
- Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
- 10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case
Test yourself
Should the federal circuit court grant the writ?