NLRB v. Yeshiva University
Facts
Yeshiva University is a private university with a central administration and substantially autonomous schools. At the school level, full-time faculty met through formal and informal bodies and effectively determined curriculum, grading, admissions and matriculation standards, academic calendars, and course schedules. Faculty also made recommendations in every case of hiring, tenure, sabbaticals, termination, and promotion, and the overwhelming majority of those recommendations were implemented by the administration. In some instances faculty also made final decisions about student admission, expulsion, and graduation, and at times their views determined matters such as tuition, enrollment levels, and the location of a school.
Issue
Whether Yeshiva University's full-time faculty are excluded from the National Labor Relations Act as managerial employees. More specifically, the question was whether faculty who exercise extensive authority in academic and personnel matters are managerial even though they are also professional employees and the university's trustees retain ultimate authority.
Rule
Managerial employees are those who formulate and effectuate management policies by expressing and making operative the decisions of their employer. An employee may be excluded as managerial when he represents management interests by taking or recommending discretionary actions that effectively control or implement employer policy; final authority in a board of trustees does not defeat managerial status, and professional judgment does not prevent an employee's decisions from being managerial.
See the holding & full analysis
Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.
- The court's holding and reasoning
- Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
- 10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case
Test yourself
If the faculty seek to unionize under the NLRA, which is the strongest argument that they are excluded from the Act?