People v. Chavez
Facts
The defendant was convicted, upon a guilty plea, of two counts of assault in the third degree. The Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered judgment and imposed sentence on March 8, 2022. On appeal, the defendant's assigned counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California seeking leave to withdraw. The appellate court addressed whether any nonfrivolous issues existed in the record.
Issue
Whether assigned counsel's Anders submission was sufficient and whether, upon the court's independent review of the record, any nonfrivolous issues could be raised on the defendant's appeal from the judgment entered on his guilty plea.
Rule
When assigned counsel submits an adequate brief pursuant to Anders v. California, the appellate court must independently review the record to determine whether any nonfrivolous issues exist. If the court is satisfied with counsel's Anders brief and concludes after independent review that no nonfrivolous issues could be raised on appeal, it may grant counsel's application to withdraw and affirm the judgment.
See the holding & full analysis
Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.
- The court's holding and reasoning
- Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
- 10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case
Test yourself
What is the most appropriate appellate disposition?