Home › Case briefs › Civil Procedure

Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout

United States Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1874 · Civil Procedure

Civil ProcedureSubject-Matter JurisdictionPersonal JurisdictionCorporationsdiversity jurisdictioncitizenship at commencementdomestic corporationforeign corporation

Facts

The plaintiff, a citizen of Nebraska, sued the Sioux City and Pacific Railroad Company for personal injuries allegedly caused by negligence in operating a railroad at Blair, Nebraska. The company had originally been incorporated in Iowa, had built its railroad there, extended it into Nebraska, and filed a copy of its articles of incorporation with the Nebraska Secretary of State. Nebraska statutes first authorized certain out-of-state railroads to build into Nebraska and later declared such companies, upon filing their articles, to be legal corporations of Nebraska. Process in this case was served in Nebraska on Frank Harriman, described as the company's managing agent in the state.

Issue

At the time suit was commenced, was the defendant a foreign corporation or a Nebraska corporation for jurisdictional purposes? If it remained an Iowa corporation, was it an inhabitant of or found within Nebraska through an agent upon whom valid service could be made?

Rule

Questions of jurisdiction depending on citizenship are determined by the parties' citizenship at the time the suit is commenced. When a state validly provides that a foreign railroad corporation becomes a corporation of that state upon extending its line into the state and filing its articles, compliance makes the company a domestic corporation, at least as to its transactions within that state; service on an agent of that domestic corporation does not establish jurisdiction over the separate foreign corporation unless the agent is shown to be acting for the foreign corporation.

🔒

See the holding & full analysis

Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.

The court's holding and reasoning
Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case

Free sample · practice this case

Test yourself

One of 10 multiple-choice questions for this case. Pick an answer to see why.

Lena Ortiz, a citizen of Kansas, was injured in 2021 while riding near Topeka on a rail line operated by Prairie Meridian Rail, a corporation originally chartered in Missouri. In 2023, before Lena filed suit, Kansas enacted a statute providing that any Missouri railroad that had extended track into Kansas and filed its charter with the Kansas Secretary of State "is a legal corporation of this State" as to its Kansas operations; Prairie Meridian had already satisfied those conditions. Lena then sued Prairie Meridian in federal court in Kansas, alleging diversity based on the company's Missouri origin.

Should the federal court treat Prairie Meridian as a Missouri citizen for diversity purposes because it was Missouri-chartered when the injury occurred?

Explanation. Jurisdiction depending on citizenship is determined at the commencement of the suit, not at the time of the accident. Where a state statute validly provides that a foreign railroad becomes a corporation of that state upon specified acts, and the railroad has complied before suit is filed, the court treats it as a domestic corporation at least for its in-state transactions. Thus the company's Missouri origin at the time of injury does not control. (Derived from Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout (1874).)