Ambach v. Norwick
Facts
New York Education Law § 3001(3) barred certification as a public school teacher for any person who was not a United States citizen unless that person had manifested an intention to apply for citizenship, with regulatory exceptions for aliens not yet eligible for citizenship. Appellees Norwick and Dachinger were resident aliens married to United States citizens who met New York's educational requirements for teacher certification but refused to seek citizenship despite being eligible to do so. Their applications for certification to teach nursery school through sixth grade were denied solely because they did not satisfy § 3001(3). Because certification was required to work in New York public elementary or secondary schools, they sued to enjoin enforcement of the statute.
Issue
May a State, consistently with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, refuse to employ as elementary and secondary public school teachers aliens who are eligible for United States citizenship but refuse to seek naturalization? More specifically, does public school teaching fall within the governmental function exception so that a citizenship requirement is reviewed only for rationality?
Rule
Although alienage classifications ordinarily are inherently suspect, a State may impose a citizenship requirement for positions that fall within the governmental function principle—positions bound up with the operation of the State as a governmental entity and involving participation in the process of self-government. Public elementary and secondary school teachers perform such a governmental function, so a citizenship requirement for those positions need only bear a rational relationship to a legitimate state interest.
See the holding & full analysis
Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.
- The court's holding and reasoning
- Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
- 10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case
Test yourself
If Elena brings an Equal Protection challenge, which is the strongest analysis?