DeSylva v. Ballentine
Facts
A deceased author had secured original copyrights on numerous musical compositions but died before the time to apply for renewal arose. He was survived by his widow and one illegitimate child, both still living. The child's mother brought suit on the child's behalf, claiming the child shared in copyrights already renewed by the widow and in those to become renewable during the widow's lifetime. The record showed California was the only relevant state, and the District Court found the child came within California Probate Code § 255.
Issue
Under 17 U.S.C. § 24, do the widow and children of a deceased author take renewal rights as a class, or does the widow take first to the exclusion of children during her lifetime? If they take as a class, does the term 'children' include an illegitimate child who, under applicable state law, is an heir of the author?
Rule
Under 17 U.S.C. § 24, when an author dies before renewal, the widow or widower and the author's children succeed to the right of renewal as a class and each is entitled to share in the renewal term. The content of the federal term 'children' is determined by reference to applicable state law governing family status and descent, and for purposes of § 24 the controlling question is whether the child would be an heir of the author under that state law.
See the holding & full analysis
Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.
- The court's holding and reasoning
- Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
- 10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case
Test yourself
Who holds the renewal right when the first copyright becomes eligible for renewal?