F. d. v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954 · Civil Procedure

215 F.2d 542

Updated July 9, 2026

civprotort immunitystate law in federal courtSouth Carolina lawcharitable immunitytort liabilityrural electric cooperativepublic purpose

Facts

James Earl Byrd sought damages for the loss of both arms and other injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of employees of Blue Ridge Rural Electrical Cooperative, Inc. The defendant was a nonprofit cooperative organized under South Carolina's Rural Electric Cooperative Act to supply electric energy in rural areas. The district court concluded that, because the cooperative served a laudable public purpose and enjoyed statutory exemptions from some regulation and taxes, it should receive the same tort immunity South Carolina gives public charities. The cooperative defended the judgment by arguing that it was charitable or eleemosynary in nature and quasi-public by statute.

Issue

Whether, under South Carolina law, a rural electric cooperative organized as a nonprofit corporation to provide electric service in rural areas is exempt from tort liability as a charitable corporation or otherwise because it serves a public purpose and receives statutory tax and regulatory benefits.

Rule

In South Carolina, exemption from tort liability for nongovernmental corporations extends only to true charitable corporations as recognized by state law. Whether an entity is charitable depends on the nature and quality of its organization and business, not merely on nonprofit status, service to the public, favorable tax treatment, or the pursuit of a beneficial public purpose.

🔒

See the holding & full analysis

Create a free KwikCourt account to unlock the rest of this brief — and practice the case.

The court's holding and reasoning
Doctrine tests, pitfalls & exam hypotheticals
10 practice questions + 4 AI-graded essays on this case

Free sample · practice this case

Test yourself

One of 10 multiple-choice questions for this case. Pick an answer to see why.

Palmetto Fiber Cooperative is a South Carolina nonprofit corporation formed by residents near Florence to install and maintain low-cost broadband lines for its members. After a trench dug by its crew collapses and injures Dana Lowe, the cooperative argues it is immune from tort liability because it operates without profit and exists to improve life in underserved rural communities.

How should a court applying the majority's reasoning most likely rule on the immunity claim?

Explanation. Under the majority's rule, South Carolina tort immunity for nongovernmental corporations extends only to true charitable corporations. The inquiry turns on the nature and quality of the organization's business, not merely its nonprofit form or public benefit. A private enterprise organized to provide members a material service at low cost remains essentially a business venture rather than a charity. (Derived from F. d. v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. (n.d.).)